Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Golden Gate Ferry Co. v. Railroad Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12388Published

1Concurrence

PBBSTON, J., Concurring.

I concur in the judgment, but prefer to base my conclusion upon the following grounds:

This proceeding requires the court to declare the legislative mind when enacting on the fifteenth day of June, 1923 (Stats. 1923, p. 834), subdivision d of section 50 of the Public Utilities Act (Deering’s Gen. Laws, part two, p. 2863, title 464), which reads in part: “No corporation or person, their lessees, trustee, receivers or trustees appointed by any court whosoever shall hereafter operate or cause to be operated, any vessel between points exclusively on the inland waters of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. Ventura Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Oro Elec. Corp. v. R.R. Comm'n of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. R.R. Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Motor Transit Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand & Car Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API