Vivus, Inc. v. Kercso
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: INVENTOR-SHIP ISSUES
INFANTE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Counterclaim defendants Vivus, Inc., Dr. Virgil A. Place, and Leland F. Wilson move for a summary judgment on Counterelaimant Josef E. Kercso’s First and Second Causes of Action. Counterclaim defendants request that summary judgment be entered on Kercso’s claim that he is the sole inventor, or at least a co-inventor, of the subject matter disclosed in the ’391 and ’535 patents, and on the claim that the patents should be declared invalid and/or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Multiscan Technologies USA LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024