Legal Opinion

Lich v. Cornhusker Casualty Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided July 1, 1991No. CV 89-0-78PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

CAMBRIDGE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment (Filing Nos. 29, 33, and 50). The parties have agreed that there are no genuine issues as to any material facts, that this case can be resolved on the pending motions for summary judgment without a trial, and that all evidence which would have been presented at trial is already before the Court on the pending motions.

This action arises under the market agency bonding provisions of the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 (Act), 7 U.S.C. § 181 et seq., as amended. In this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. General Facilities, Inc. v. National Marine Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Mobil Oil Corp. v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
  5. Rowse v. Platte Valley Livestock, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J.C. Brager Co. v. ChesenDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1998
  2. Martin D. Yoder v. Jack FoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API