People v. Bornman
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CRISWELL.
Defendant, Stephen L. Bomman, appeals the judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict 'finding him guilty of theft of more than $400. He contends, among other things, that the jurors were improperly instructed that the mens rea requirement of “knowingly” did not apply to the element of “without authorization” under the theft statute. We agree; hence, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
I
Section 18-4-401(1), C.R.S.1997, provides that:
A person commits theft when he knowingly obtains or exercises control over anything of value of another without authorization…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. FreemanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Board of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- People v. BossertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Auman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- People v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Leiting v. MuthaColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. AumanColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. SharpColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.