Legal Opinion
Chulsky v. Golden Corral Corporation
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 23, 2022No. 1:19-cv-00875Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION IRINA CHULSKY, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:19-cv-875 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff Irina Chulsky’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Doc. 29). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Chulsky’s Motion (Doc. 29). However, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Chulsky’s remaining, purely state-law claims against Defendant Kurt Parry, and therefore DISMISSES Chulsky’s Complaint,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.