Hirshfield v. Craig
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
McAvoy, J.:
These are appeals from three orders. Two of the orders deny motions to vacate attachments of the person of the appellant *557Craig and of one Rinn, an official in the office of the comptroller, for their failure to attend hearings before the commissioner of accounts pursuant to subpoenas issued in matters pending before him, and for the refusal of the said Craig to produce papers and documents under subpoenas duces tecum. The third order is a direction to continue the proceedings therein mentioned for the purpose of taking proof of the truth of statements contained in affidavits on a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beardsley v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Kiff v. . YoumansNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Matter of Hirshfield v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Morris v. . TuthillNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Auburn and Cato Plank Road Co. v. . DouglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of CurtissNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- Gans v. Delaware Terminal Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
- In re WeinerNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Hirshfield v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924