Legal Opinion
In re Weiner
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Petitioner, the owner of an ambulance and oxygen service in the borough of Brooklyn, city of New York, moves herein to quash a subpcena and a subpcena duces tecum issued by the Commissioner of Investigation of the City of New York, which directs petitioner to appear and to bring with him his books of account showing records “ concerning the selection, hiring and use of ambulances and ambulance service for transportation of patients into city hospitals.”
The facts as they appear relevant are as follows: On March 20, 1944, pursuant to section 803 of the New York City Charter, the Commissioner of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Matter of Hirshfield v. CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Matter of Hirschfield v. . HanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Matter of LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In re Vacate Subpœnas Duces Tecum Addressed to Wilman AgencyNew York Supreme Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marcello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- People v. LainoNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- United States Ex Rel. Laino v. Warden of Wallkill PrisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- People v. MarahanNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1959