Legal Opinion
IceMOS Technology Corporation v. Omron Corporation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 24, 2020No. 2:17-cv-02575Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 IceMOS Technology Corporation, No. CV-17-02575-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Omron Corporation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendant Omron Corporation’s Motion to Continue 16 the Trial to November 30, 2020. (Doc. 497). Plaintiff IceMOS Technology Corporation 17 has responded in opposition, (Doc. 508), and Defendant has replied, (Doc. 509). Plaintiff 18 seeks leave to file a sur-reply, which has been lodged with the Court. (Doc. 510; 19 Doc. 511). The Court now rules. 20 I.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Larry FlyntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Francisco TelloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Jerome M. Armant v. Joe MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Angel Martel v. County of Los Angeles Elias Cuevas Harry Delong Richard Mariadiaga Mark ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WillisonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011