Legal Opinion
Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. R and L Business Mgt.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 12, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00397Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY, a No. 2:21-cv-00397 WBS JDP Delaware corporation, formerly 13 known as ROYAL INSURNACE COMPANY, and successor to ROYAL 14 GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER RE: CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO; and ROES 1-50, inclusive, 18 Defendant. 19 20 ----oo0oo---- 21 22 This is an insurance coverage dispute concerning 23 whether plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity Company (“Arrowood”) has an 24 obligation, under its duty to indemnity to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Victoria Zetwick v. County of YoloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- People v. FriendCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada Paul R. Brown Greg Gable Gary Peck Shundahai Network Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Committee v. City of Las Vegas Jan Laverty Jones Fremont Street Limited Liability Corp. Mark Paris, American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada Paul R. Brown Greg Gable Gary Peck Shundahai Network Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Committee v. City of Las Vegas Jan Laverty Jones Fremont Street Limited Liability Corp. Mark ParisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.