Legal Opinion
Rainier Nat. Park Co. v. Martin
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 4, 1937No. 582PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought to obtain an injunction against defendants, as members of and constituting the Tax Commission of the State of Washington, restraining them *483from making an assessment for tax against plaintiff, pursuant to the State Revenue Act of 1935 (Laws Wash.1935, p. 706). The ground is that such act is, as to plaintiff, unconstitutional and void.
On March 2, 1899, Congress “dedicated and set apart as a public park, to be known and designated as the Mount Rainier National Park, for the benefit and enjoyment of the people” certain lands located in Washington. 16…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Des Moines National Bank v. FairweatherSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Aberdeen Bank v. Chehalis CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gaulden v. KirkSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Ainsworth v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. WertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- City of S.F. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.