Legal Opinion
Lenox Hill Radiology & MIA P.C. v. Global Liberty Insurance
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided May 21, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arlene P. Bluth, J.
*435Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted and the complaint is dismissed.
Plaintiff commenced the instant action to recover first-party no-fault benefits in the amount of $2,670.39, plus statutory interest, costs and attorneys’ fees, for three MRI studies it allegedly conducted for its assignor, Nila Sokol. Two were allegedly performed on June 7, 2007 for which plaintiff billed defendant $879.72 and $912, and a third on June 12, 2007 for $878.67.
Plaintiffs attorneys submitted each bill to defendant with a form cover letter on the attorneys’…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- St. Vincent's Hospital v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Center v. Hampton Affiliates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Residential Holding Corp. v. Scottsdale InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cambridge Medical, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2010
- Flatbush Acupuncture P.C. v. Repwest Ins. Co., Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County2025
- Flatbush Acupuncture P.C. v. Repwest Ins. Co., Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County2025
- Advanced Neurological Care, P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York District Court · 2012
- Custom Orthotics, Ltd. v. Government Employees InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.