Legal Opinion
Cambridge Medical, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided March 5, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*187OPINION OF THE COURT
Katherine A. Levine, J.
During oral argument, the parties stipulated that the only issue before the court was whether 11 NYCRR 65-3.6 (b) requires the insurer to notify the injured party when it sends the follow-up verification request to the plaintiff provider. This court has already determined and reiterates herein that the injured party need not be notified. (See Cambridge Med., P.C. v Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., Civ Ct, Richmond County, Feb. 22, 2010, index No. 4561/08.)
Pursuant to Insurance Law § 5106 (a) and 11 NYCRR 65-3.8, an insurer is required to either pay…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Westchester County Medical Center v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- East Acupuncture, P.C. v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Advanced Neurological Care, P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York District Court · 2012
- MB Advanced Equipment, Inc. v. MVAICCivil Court of the City of New York · 2015