Legal Opinion

Camarella v. East Irondequoit Central School Board

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1974PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements awarded to the appellants. In view of the highly unusual procedural posture in which this appeal comes to us, particularly the fact that the appellants may have been misled by respondent’s failure clearly *142to assert the timeliness issue until after the tort claim had been tried on the merits, in the exercise of our discretion, we deem it appropriate to assess costs and disbursements against the respondent School Board, the party prevailing on this appeal. (CPLR 8107.)

With respect to the merits of…

2Cited by51 opinions

  1. Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Felice v. Eastport/South Manor Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Gerzel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Ziecker v. Town of Orchard ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Scantlebury v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2005

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API