Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Blanton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 8, 1921No. 9729PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Garvin County; E. B. Swank, Judge. Action by J. T. Blanton, O. W. Patchell, and E. W. Patchell against Annie Gardner and James Chisholm for the possession of certain land in Garvin County and for the rents and profits derived therefrom pending the suit. Erom an order of the district court overruling motion for new trial, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

On March 3, 1917, action was begun by plaintiffs, defendants in error here, against the defendants, plaintiffs in error here, for the possession of certain land in Garvin county and for the rents and profits derived therefrom pending the suit. A receiver was appointed by the court on April 20, 1917, to have charge of the land and the rents thereof. The cause was tried to a jury and on .Thursday, September 27, 1917, at about 1:30 o’clock p. m., a verdict was returned for the plaintiffs for possession of the land. Very soon thereafter, or at about 2:00 o’clock p. m., counsel for defendants left…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McAdams v. LathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. J. W. Ripey Son v. the Art Wall Paper MillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Thompson v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Sneary v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Riely v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. BatisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. McKinney v. SwiftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Kowlak v. Tensleep Merc. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Abraham v. Roland Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Sooner Bond Co. of America v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API