Moakley v. Blog
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.
The defendants recovered judgment in a quiet title suit and plaintiffs appeal. The points argued upon this appeal involve the construction of two conveyances, each of which contained exceptions, reservations, or conditions. The first one of these two conveyances was executed by George P. Lyman and others, who for purposes of this case may be considered the original owners. By it said Lyman and others conveyed out of their holdings on October 21, 1899, a strip of land to the Los Angeles Pacific Railway Company. This conveyance “granted, bargained, sold, conveyed and confirmed” to the railway…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnston v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Jacobs v. All Persons, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Hannah v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Pritchard v. LewisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Bolio v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Boynton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Romero v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.