Legal Opinion

Honickman v. Blom Bank

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 14, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00008Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------X MICHAL HONICKMAN for the ESTATE OF HOWARD GOLDSTEIN, et al., Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM & ORDER v. 19-cv-00008(KAM)(SMG) BLOM BANK SAL, Defendant. ---------------------------------X Plaintiffs are victims, or the relatives of victims, of attacks conducted by Hamas, a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (“FTO”),1 between December 2001 and August 2003 in Israel and the Palestinian Territories (“Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs commenced this action pursuant to the Anti-Terrorism Act (“ATA”), as amended by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API