Coleman v. Taub
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
Posed for decision are defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts V and X of plaintiffs’ complaint and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on Count X. Both motions turn on the validity of a corporate merger effectuated during the pendency of this litigation. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion will be denied and plaintiffs’ motion will be granted.
FACTS
In February, 1978, plaintiff Leon Coleman’s (“plaintiff” or “Coleman”) employment with defendants Taub Builders, Inc. (“Old Taub”) and Aaron Taub was terminated. At that time, defendants…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In the Matter of Combined Metals Reduction Company, Debtor (Ten Cases). Irving Bennett v. Paul Gemmill, Trustee, (Four Cases). Irving Bennett v. W. Lamonte Robison, Trustee, (Four Cases). Irving Bennett v. Paul Gemmill, Trustee, Jeremiah Milbank, and Milbank & Co., Irving Bennett, Entrada Industries, Inc. (Wasatch Chemical Division), Charles A. Steen, Individually, Charles A. Steen, as Custodian for His Sons and Heirs, and Charles A. Steen on Behalf of the Steen Foundation v. Paul Gemmill, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coleman v. TaubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Coleman v. TaubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Franchetti v. Intercole Automation, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Lewis v. KnutsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1980