Monroe v. Scott

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

Appellants contend that the trial court erred in determining the ownership of the reverter of a non-participating term royalty interest. The parties submitted cross-motions for summary judgment below, and the district court declared that following the expiration of the term, appellees were entitled to one-half (½) of the reverter pursuant to a partition deed. We affirm.

By their first two points, appellants assert that the trial court erred in granting judgment for appellees and denying their motion. The parties agree on the material facts. Sudie D. Scott, appellees’…