Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2014No. 26819PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] A jury found Derrick Scott guilty of aggravated assault. Scott appealed to this Court, arguing that the State’s peremptory strike of a Native American veniremember violated the Equal Protection Clause as applied in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Because the circuit court did not perform the third step of the Batson analysis, we remanded for the court to perform the missing analysis. See State v. Scott, 2013 S.D. 31, ¶¶ 22-23, 829 N.W.2d 458, 466-67. On remand, the circuit court, with a new judge presiding, performed the third step…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. RobertsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API