Legal Opinion

Sturm v. TOC Retail, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided October 4, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-329-1-MAC (WDO)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

OWENS, Chief Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, through which defendant asks the court to find that plaintiffs, after being respectively appointed to the position of store manager, were “executives” within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(1). Plaintiffs in this case seek to hold defendant, the owner of a convenience store chain, liable for violations of the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207. If the plaintiffs did indeed become “executives,” defendant would be exempt from that point forward from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Burger King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. Rau v. Darling's Drug Store, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Anderson v. Federal Cartridge CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1945
  4. Horne v. Crown Central Petroleum, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1991
  5. Dole v. Papa Gino's of America, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Speedway SuperAmerica, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Baldwin v. Trailer Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Goodrow v. Lane Bryant, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Rozenblum v. Ocean Beach PropertiesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
  5. Alachua County Board of County Commissioners v. BabulaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API