Sanchez v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered June 15, 1989, dismissing the complaint, following a jury verdict in favor of defendant Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority ("MABSTOA”) reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the case remanded for a new trial, without costs.
The cumulative effect of improperly admitted hearsay evi*403dence and improper assertions by counsel for MABSTOA was so prejudicial to plaintiff as to warrant a new trial.
It was the contention of plaintiff Romeo Sanchez ("Sanchez”) that while attempting to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Williams v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Taormina v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Caraballo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Martin v. Alabama 84 Truck Rental, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dwyer v. NicholsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Mohamed v. Cellino & BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Nuccio v. ChouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Holman v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2008
- Pillco v. 160 Dikeman St., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.