Legal Opinion

Aguilar v. Thompson Coburn LLP

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 2018No. ED 105570PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge

Introduction

Plaintiffs appeal from the circuit court's judgment dismissing their petition against Thompson Coburn LLP ("Thompson Coburn"). Plaintiffs raise six points on appeal. In their first point, Plaintiffs contend that the circuit court erroneously dismissed *912their petition because the five-year statute of limitations contained in Section 516.1201 did not bar their claims. Finding the first point dispositive, we hold that Section 516.120 bars Plaintiffs' claims because they filed suit more than five years after their damages became capable of ascertainment. Accordingly, the circuit court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. Klemme v. BestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Powel v. Chaminade College Preparatory, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. Jepson v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  5. Farrow v. Saint Francis Medical CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Agnew v. Mo.-Am. Water Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Lana Weinbach v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. Sharon Watson, as Trustee of the George T. and Mary E. Watson Trust dated November 18, 1997 v. Menard, Inc. d/b/a Menards, and City of Richmond Heights, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API