Legal Opinion

Carolina National Bank v. City of Greenville

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 29, 1914No. 8835PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Before Shipp, J., Action by the Carolina National Bank of Columbia, S. C., against the city of Greenville and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, certain of the defendants appeal.

Read the full summary

Before Shipp, J., Action by the Carolina National Bank of Columbia, S. C., against the city of Greenville and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, certain of the defendants appeal. The following is the complaint of the plaintiff: “(1) That the plaintiff is a corporation created under the National Banking Act, its principal place of business being in Columbia, S. C. “(2) That the city of Greenville, S. C., is a municipal corporation, created under the laws of said State, and that W. E. Beattie, W. C. Gibson, and W. C. Cleveland constitute the paving commission of said city of Greenville…

1Opinion of the Court

April 29, 1914. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This record contains the following statement: "This action was instituted in the Court of Common Pleas for Greenville county, on the 10th day of February, 1912, for the purpose of ascertaining the amount due by the city of Greenville, under its contract with Bowe Page, and requiring the city to pay over to the plaintiff from said balance, the amount due on two notes given to plaintiff by Bowe Page, and an overdraft. On March 9, 1912, the attorneys for the plaintiff consenting, an order was signed by Judge R.W. Memminger, making W.C.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. RabbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  2. Singleton v. SingletonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. Williams & Co. v. PaysingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1881

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Crowley Ex Rel. Estate of Crowley v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. MacK Manufacturing Co. v. Mass. Bonding & Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  3. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. EhrichDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1916
  4. Ward v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
  5. In re TansillDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API