Legal Opinion
In re Tansill
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
Decided March 21, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATKINS, District Judge.
This matter comes before me upon petition of Wood-ruff Oil & Fertilizer Company to review an order of the referee whereby the claim of petitioner to the proceeds of the sale of certain bales of linters in the hands of the trustee was disallowed.
Pursuant to a voluntary petition filed on June 3,1921, H. A. Tansill, engaged in business at Greenville, S. C., under the style of Carolina Waste 'Company, was on June 4, 1921, adjudged a bankrupt. For some years prior to the adjudication the bankrupt had maintained a place of business, including a warehouse or warehouses, in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Union Bank of Chicago v. Kansas City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Etheridge v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Eaton v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- In re Baxter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Fowler v. Pennsylvania Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- In Re Truscott Boat & Dock Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1950
- In Re Wright Homes, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1968
- Fowler v. Pennsylvania Tire CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.