Legal Opinion

State v. Lykins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 20, 2013No. C100530CR, D101103M; A146498, A146499PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction that included, among others, one count of tampering with a witness, ORS 162.285, assigning error to the trial court’s imposition of an upward departure sentence of 48 months’ incarceration on that count. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in concluding that both the state and the witness were particularly vulnerable victims for purposes of applying the “vulnerable victim” aggravating factor under OAR 213-008-0002(l)(b)(B).1 Specifically, defendant argues that the state, not the witness, is the “victim” for purposes of the crime of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TeixeiraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. EnemesioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. WolffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. ENEMESIOOregon Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LykinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API