Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Hill
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided December 18, 2001No. 9:00-cv-00214PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COBB, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt # 17], and the court having reviewed the motion and response on file is of the opinion that the motion be GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART.
Plaintiff in this case alleges that Angelina County police officers unlawfully arrested him and used excessive force in the course of that arrest, resulting in physical and emotional injury. Plaintiff filed this action against both the County and the individual officers asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under state laws. Now before the court…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Price v. Jefferson CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Price v. Jefferson CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006