Legal Opinion

Reichenbach v. Hayes, Johnson & Conley, PLLC

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00932Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SETH A. REICHENBACH AND BRYAN C. REICHENBACH, NO. 3:19-CV-00932-ARC Plaintiffs, J 2 (JUDGE CAPUTO) HAYES, JOHNSON & CONLEY, PLLC AND JOEL D. JOHNSON, Defendants. MEMORANDUM Presently before me is the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (See Doc. 7) filed by the Defendants, Hayes, Johnson & Conley, PLLC and Joel D. Johnson (collectively, “the Defendants”). The Plaintiffs, Seth A. Reichenbach and Bryan C. Reichenbach (collectively, “the Plaintiffs”) allege that the Defendants filed an action against them in violation of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API