Legal Opinion
Leksi, Inc. v. Federal Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 29, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-4123(SSB)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the court is plaintiff Leksi, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment as to the law to be applied to comprehensive general liability clauses (hereinafter “CGL” clauses) contained in policies issued by defendants. New Jersey law is more liberal in finding coverage than is the law of Pennsylvania, the place of the contract. 1 Consequently, Leksi, the insured, seeks to apply the law of New Jersey.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Leksi Inc., formerly known as Sartomer Resins, Inc., and Sartomer Industries, Inc., is a Delaware corporation which, at all…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Broadwell Realty Services, Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Nestle Foods Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Maryland Casualty Company, W.R. Grace & Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Gilbert Spruance Co. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Armotek Industries, Inc., Appellant/cross in 90-5969 v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, Appellee/cross in 90-6001Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.