Legal Opinion
Ray v. Bassil
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 4, 1976No. 141, September Term, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
In considering a directed verdict motion in a negligence case, the standard laid down by the cases for measuring the sufficiency of evidence requires the court to reject any evidence which is not credible.
The standard was stated by the Court of Appeals in Curley v. General Valet Service, 270 Md. 248, 264, 311 A. 2d 231 (1973), to be:
“ * * * that before it can be determined as a matter of law that one has not been guilty of negligence, the truth of all the credible evidence tending to sustain the claim of negligence must be assumed and all favorable inferences of fact fairly deducible…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Slacum v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Nizer v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Eisenhower v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Curley v. General Valet Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Kaufman v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bohnert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- N.B.S., Inc. v. HarveyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998