Wright v. Everett
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Monona District Court. — Hon. GeoegeW. Wakeeield, Judge. This is an action between a farm tenant and his landlord. The plaintiff and another rented a farm of the defendant for the years 1888, 1889, and 1890.. The plaintiff’s partner in the enterprise was one Collins.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Monona District Court. — Hon. GeoegeW. Wakeeield, Judge. This is an action between a farm tenant and his landlord. The plaintiff and another rented a farm of the defendant for the years 1888, 1889, and 1890.. The plaintiff’s partner in the enterprise was one Collins. The farm was cultivated by the plaintiff and Collins in the year 1888. In January, 1889, the defendant gave Collins and the plaintiff notice to quit the premises, and the defendant, while the said tenants yet occupied the house on the land, went upon the premises and commenced farming operations in March, 1889, and…
1Opinion of the CourtBothkock, J.
i. landlord and tíonfejeot-0" ages.’ — I. The first cause of action was for work and labor on the farm, in ditching, shingling a house, and making a cave on the farm. The jury found that there was no merit in this claim. The second count was for work and labor during the years 1887 and 1888, part of it being done on the leased farm. The jury found for the plaintiff on this count in the sum of thirty-seven dollars and seventeen cents. The amount claimed was one hundred and three dollars and seventy-five cents. The third claim was for the alleged wrongful, unlawful and malicious seizure of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Conklin v. YatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Powell v. MerrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- Eggers v. PaustianSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Tarpy v. BlumeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Greenberg v. MurphyCuyahoga Circuit Court · 1904