Hill v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McDonald, judge.
Upon a plea of guilty before the court, without the aid of a jury, appellant was found guilty of theft from the person; the punishment, two (2) years in the State penitentiary.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in overruling her motion for new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. This contention is not-properly before this court for review for the reason that it is not presented by a formal bill of exception. See Caldwell v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 364 S.W.2d 242, where this court, speaking through the writer stated, “ * * the rule requiring complaint of failure…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hoskins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Caldwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
3Cited by10 opinions
- Luna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Longoria v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Birdsong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Harden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Harden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.