Harden v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Dissent 1
OPINION
2Dissent · MorrisonMorrison, Judge
I must, to be consistent with what I have said in the past, dissent to that portion of my Brother Onion’s opinion in which he considers the picture which has never been filed or introduced in evidence in the trial court. Reference is made to the following cases: Selvidge v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 140, 345 S.W.2d 523; Cunningham v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.R. 3, 353 S.W.2d 37; Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 375 S.W.2d 306; Ex parte Seffens, Tex.Cr.App., 376 S.W.2d 348; Luna v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 387 S.W. 2d 660; McDonald v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 385 S.W.2d 253; and Culbert v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 415…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Selvidge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Ex Parte SeffensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.