Legal Opinion

Homebrite Ace Hardware v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 8, 2004No. 5-03-0650 WCPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Callum

delivered, the opinion of the court:

Claimant, Kevin Schnoeker, filed an application for adjustment of claim under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 2002)) while working for employer, Homebrite Ace Hardware. Following a hearing on claimant’s section 19(b) petition (820 ILCS 305/19(b) (West 2002)), the arbitrator awarded claimant 54 weeks of temporary total disability (TTD) benefits and directed employer to authorize claimant’s prescribed cervical spine surgery. The Industrial Commission (Commission) affirmed and adopted the arbitrator’s decision, and it remanded…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Sisbro, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Trettenero v. POLICE PENSION FUND OF AURORAAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Baggett v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Land & Lakes Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Aurora East School District v. DoverAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Certified Testing v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. Piasa Motor Fuels v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. City of Chicago v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API