Legal Opinion

Piasa Motor Fuels v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 23, 2006No. 5-05-0570 WCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Callum

I. INTRODUCTION

Claimant, Kenneth Ruyle, filed an application for adjustment of claim under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 2002)) for injuries he allegedly sustained while working for employer, Piasa Motor Fuels. The arbitrator denied benefits. The Industrial Commission1 (Commission), in a decision signed by Chairman Dennis R. Ruth and two commissioners, reversed. It awarded claimant 24 weeks’ temporary total disability (TTD) benefits and $95,915.50 in medical expenses and found that claimant was disabled to the extent of 25% of a person as a whole. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sisbro, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Cassens Transport Co. v. Illinois Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hamilton v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Vogel v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Illinios Workers Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Arnold v. Mt. Carmel Public UtilityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Elmhurst Park District v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Blackburn v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Piasa Motor Fuels v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API