Legal Opinion

Sterling Bronze Co. v. Syria Improvement Ass'n

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1910No. Appeal, No. 174PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal, No. 174, Oct. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., March T., 1903, No. 814, arresting judgment in ease of Sterling Bronze Company v. Syria Improvement Association, Owner or Reputed Owner and Contractor. Scire facias sur mechanic's lien. Before Ford, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was order arresting the judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Elkin,

The disposition made of this case by the learned court below is so clearly right under the recent decisions of this court that but little need be said in support of the motion allowed in arrest of judgment. The proceeding is a scire facias sur mechanic’s lien which had expired by lapse of time. The record shows that the lien was filed February 6, 1903; a scire facias was issued thereon the same day; a jury was called, impaneled and sworn November 10, 1908; a verdict for plaintiff was returned November 11, 1908, and the judgment was arrested February 9, 1909. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vulcanite Portland Cement Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Henry Taylor Lumber Co. v. Carnegie InstituteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Vulcanite Paving Co. v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Page v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Hoffman Lumber Co. v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Sax v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Sumption v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API