Legal Opinion

Capital City Lumber Co. v. Ellerbrock

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1964No. 38607Published

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

There are two matters for determination by this court:

1. Was it necessary for appellee under Section 1311.06, Revised Code, to name both the appellants, tenants in common of the real property involved, in its affidavit for a mechanic’s lien to have an effective lien as to the interest in the property of the one named?

2. Was it necessary under Section 1311.04, Revised Code, for appellee, in its affidavit, to include the Leonard L. Smith Marble Tile & Slate Company as a materialman?

Section 1311.01, Revised Code, found in the chapter on liens, contains definitions and provides in part:

“As used…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClintic-Marshall Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Norris v. NitschSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Dunlap Etc. v. TeagleSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API