California Pharmacists Ass'n v. Maxwell-Jolly
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Plaintiffs-Appellants, the California Pharmacists Association, et al., filed this suit to challenge the Medi-Cal reimbursement rate reductions to various providers as set forth in AB 1183. A group of the plaintiffs, the Hospital Plaintiffs, which comprises the California Hospital Association and some individual hospitals, filed a motion in the district court for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the defendant from reducing Medi-Cal fee-for-service rates to hospitals, 1 arguing that AB 1183 was enacted in violation of § 1396a(a)(30)(A) of Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Earth Island Institute v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.