Legal Opinion

California Pharmacists Ass'n v. Maxwell-Jolly

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 6, 2009No. 09-55365PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellants, the California Pharmacists Association, et al., filed this suit to challenge the Medi-Cal reimbursement rate reductions to various providers as set forth in AB 1183. A group of the plaintiffs, the Hospital Plaintiffs, which comprises the California Hospital Association and some individual hospitals, filed a motion in the district court for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the defendant from reducing Medi-Cal fee-for-service rates to hospitals, 1 arguing that AB 1183 was enacted in violation of § 1396a(a)(30)(A) of Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Earth Island Institute v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API