Legal Opinion

United States v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2017No. 16-2229PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge.

Rodney Miller was sentenced as a career offender under the 1998 version of the Sentencing Guidelines, based in part on his prior conviction for a crime of violence. After the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), Miller filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his career-offender sentence, arguing his sentence violates due process. Specifically, Miller contended the residual clause in the Guidelines is void for vagueness — a rule he argued applies retroactively in collateral proceedings. Miller…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Simpson v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. Dimott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. DeiterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  5. Todd D'Antoni v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API