Legal Opinion

Bowie v. Landry

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 21, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, C. J.

This case comes to the Law Court on plaintiffs’ exceptions. The action is a writ of entry describing certain land in Androscoggin County and alleging that the plaintiffs are the owners in common, and that the defendant disseized them within twenty years, and unjustly* withholds. The declaration seeks rents and profits, for trees: cut, and other waste. The defendant pleaded nul disseisin. with a brief statement claiming res judicata, and also claimed an estoppel, because one of the plaintiffs, for the benefit of all, had previously brought trespass quare clausum alleging trees cut and removed,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Susi v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  2. Bray v. SpencerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  3. Bowie v. LandrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  4. Kimball v. HiltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
  5. Hayden v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sargent v. CoolidgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Lewien v. CohenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Thaxter v. FrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API