Legal Opinion

Speyer v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 26, 1945No. C. D. 918Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These suits arising at the port of New York bring for determination the proper classification of merchandise imported under the invoice description of “Visculose Sponges.’* They were assessed by the collector at 60 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 31 (b) (2), Tariff Act of 1930, which reads as follows:

Par. 31. (b) All compounds of cellulose (except cellulose acetate, but including pyroxylin and other cellulose esters and ethers), and all compounds-, combinations, or mixtures of which any such compound is the component material of chief value:

* * * * * * $(2) made…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Alfred H. Smith Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API