Legal Opinion
Hewlett Packard Co. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 2, 2011No. Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RMC). MDL Docket No. 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON HP’S MOTION TO STRIKE
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
In this Multi District Litigation (“MDL”), Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. (“Papst”) has alleged that digital camera manufacturers that sell products in the United States have infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,470,399 (“'399 Patent”) and 6,895,-449 (“'449 Patent”) (collectively the “Patents”). In opposition, the camera manufacturers seek a declaratory judgment of non-infringement and/or patent invalidity. 1
Papst filed its Final Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions pursuant to the Court’s order. See Revised Final…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Mary Elizabeth Leary and Glenda H. Williams v. Stephen DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lovely-Coley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Victor Perez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Flynn v. LoveDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. VelasquezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Headfirst Baseball LLC v. ElwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.