Legal Opinion

Meeks v. Waggoner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 1, 1935No. 4-3985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

On January 11, 1935, Ethel E. Smith and her husband, J. C. W. Smith, filed an action in the Lonoke Circuit Court against the Magnolia Petroleum Company, a foreign corporation, and against the petitioners, Jim Meeks and Ewell Smith, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff, Ethel Smith, caused by their joint negligence in painting a strip across the sidewalk adjacent to a filling station, in the city of Little Rock, owned by the Magnolia Petroleum Company and operated by the petitioners as servants and employees, in that she stepped upon the wet…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wernimont v. State ex rel. Little Rock Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Metzger v. MannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Seelbinder v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Arkansas Democrat v. MeansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  2. Keith v. City of Cave SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Atkins Pickle Co. v. Burrough-Uerling-Brasuell Consulting Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Desoto Gathering Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API