Legal Opinion
Inner City Broadcasting Corp. v. Cardenas
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 4, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-269PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter is before the court on the motion of defendants Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and its administrator Sanders to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and on the motion of defendant Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) to dismiss. Plaintiffs Inner City Broadcasting Corporation (“Inner City”) and its subsidiary, Amistad DOT Venture Capital, Inc. (“Amistad”) seek a declaratory judgment to require the SBA to consider $3 million Amistad has received in aid from the FRA as “private” capital for the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Miguel v. McCarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Inner City Broadcasting Corporation v. James C. Sanders, Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration, Federal Railroad AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Morrison v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Dubois v. EPADistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
- DuBois v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986