Legal Opinion

In re Anonymous No. 34 D.B. 93

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1995No. Disciplinary Board Docket no. 34 D.B. 93Published

1Opinion of the Court

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania:

NIX, Member,

Pursuant to Rule 208(d) (2) (iii) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania herewith submits its findings and recommendations to your honorable court with respect to the above-captioned petition for discipline.

I. HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS

By order of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated February 25, 1993, a rule to show cause why the respondent should not be placed on temporary suspension was issued.

By order of the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. PattersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CostiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CasetySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API