Ludlow v. King
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before PeuriEoy, J., Anderson, Fall term, 1917. Action by H. Ludlow against War ley C. King and Ellison C. Asbell. From an order directing a vedict for plaintiff, defendants appeal. submit: It was error to permit the introduction in evidence of the judgment in the former case (King & Asbell v. Ludlow) : 77 S. C. 493; 215 U. S. 52; Code of Procedure, sec. 521. It is not necessary to multiply authorities to show that the judgment in this case should be reversed: Black on…
Read the full summary
Before PeuriEoy, J., Anderson, Fall term, 1917. Action by H. Ludlow against War ley C. King and Ellison C. Asbell. From an order directing a vedict for plaintiff, defendants appeal. submit: It was error to permit the introduction in evidence of the judgment in the former case (King & Asbell v. Ludlow) : 77 S. C. 493; 215 U. S. 52; Code of Procedure, sec. 521. It is not necessary to multiply authorities to show that the judgment in this case should be reversed: Black on Judgments, vol. II, sections 609 to 619, inclusive; also, sections 670, 671 and 695; 105 S. C. 137; 98 S. C. 137; 98 S. C.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Gary.
This is an appeal from an order directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The facts are thus stated in' the record:
“Plaintiff sued defendants, alleging that during the years 1913 and 1914 he was a tenant of defendant, King, and became indebted to King individually, and to King and Asbell as partners for merchandise and supplies in an amount aggregating several hundred dollars; that he had overpaid all this indebtedness; that an accounting had been had between the parties, which showed that he had overpaid all his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. KirvenSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Kirven v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Cannon v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mitchell v. Federal Intermediate Credit BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932