Legal Opinion

In Re Kinross

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1992No. C-910904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hildebrandt, Judge.

Appellant, Philip E. Pitzer, appeals from the judgment of the Probate Division of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas finding him in contempt of the court’s order of October 15, 1991. The court imposed a fine in the amount of $500 per day. 1 For the reasons that follow, we affirm the probate court’s judgment finding Pitzer in contempt, but reverse the amount of the fine imposed on him.

The record discloses that Sandra Kinross died intestate and that her husband, Ronald C. Kinross, Sr., (“Kinross”) was appointed administrator of her estate by the probate court.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Guardianship of JadwisiakOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mancino v. Tuscarawas Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Meek v. GenevaOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. In re Estate of SouthardOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Slater v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Waterman v. Elk Elk Co., L.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API