Legal Opinion

Kaehu v. Namealoha

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Exceptions prom Circuit Court, Second Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

DE BOLT, J.

This was an action of ejectment instituted in the circuit court of the second circuit to recover certain land, and upon issue being joinedi, the cause was tried by the court, jury waived, the decision being that the plaintiff take nothing.

Thereupon the plaintiff filed a bill of exceptions, the only exceptions being: “That * * * the Court filed its decision in said action, to which the plaintiff duly excepted” and that plaintiff’s motion to allow an amended complaint was denied, “to which the plaintiff, at the time, duly excepted.”

The cause now comes before us…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Fraga v. Portuguese Mutual Benefit SocietyHawaii Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Mist v. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kapuakela v. IaeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Serrao v. SoaresHawaii Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Gillespie v. McBrydeHawaii Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kang v. HarringtonHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ala Moana Boat Owners' Ass'n v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Ripley & Davis v. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Scott v. Kona Development Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Territory of Hawaii v. PierceHawaii Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API