Dorgan v. Loukas
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
Except for a possible cavil regarding the award of fees for the plaintiffs’ (tenants’) attorneys, this appeal of the defendants (landlords) is without merit.
1. The defendants were seriously at fault in failing to bring the plaintiffs’ apartment into habitable condition and to keep it so. Most grievous among the defects was the lamentable condition of the oil fired furnace and connected heating apparatus, which was supposed to deliver clean heat to the apartment, but in fact corrupted it and all within it with clinging soot. Responsibility in the matter, fastened on the landlord by the State…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boston Housing Authority v. HemingwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Young v. GarwackiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Wolfberg v. HunterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Hager v. HagerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cruz Management Co. v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Thomas v. GoudreaultCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- In Re ClarkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Jablonski v. ClemonsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Al-Ziab v. MourgisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.