Legal Opinion
Hernández v. Núñez
United States District Court
Decided June 28, 2018No. Civil No. 17–2208 (FAB)Published
1Opinion of the Court
BESOSA, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff Arturo Hernández a/k/a DVJ King Arthur ("Hernández")'s motion requesting a preliminary injunction against defendants Rubén Núñez a/k/a DJ Red Noise ("Núñez"), Jane Doe, and the conjugal partnership existing between Núñez and Jane Doe ("conjugal partnership"), filed pursuant to the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114, et seq. , Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b), and the Puerto Rico Trademark Act, P.R. Laws Ann. tit 10, § 171 et seq. , (Docket No. 2.) For the reasons set forth below, Núñez's motion is DENIED . This civil action is DISMISSED…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Figueroa v. Rivera-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Cintrón-Lorenzo v. Departamento de Asuntos del ConsumidorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Robson v. HallenbeckCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Hmg Property Investors, Inc. v. Parque Industrial Rio Canas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. v. Johannesburg Consolidated InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.