Legal Opinion
Robson v. Hallenbeck
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 3, 1996No. 95-1595, 95-1983PublishedCited by 135 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, J. Donald and Sandra Robson, brought suit against Gilman Hallenbeck and Dan DiCarlo, alleging that the defendants breached fiduciary duties owed to the Robsons, administered a trust in a grossly negligent manner, and committed fraud. The details of this action need not be discussed, since the principal issue in the plaintiffs’ appeal is procedural and we decline the defendants’ invitation to reach the merits on their cross-appeal. But because the case was ultimately dismissed on account of the plaintiffs’ conduct in pre-trial proceedings, a description of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rafael Figueroa Ruiz v. Jose E. AlegriaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Louis M. Damiani, M.D. v. Rhode Island HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Nathan Richman, Administrator v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Luis Felipe Velazquez-Rivera v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Tower Ventures, Inc. v. City of WestfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Young v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Ruiz-Rosa v. Rivera-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- John's Insulation, Inc. v. L. Addison & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Malot v. Dorado Beach Cottages AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.